Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Entertainment

Supreme Court to Weigh Whether Cities can Punish Homeless People for Sleeping on Public Land


The Supreme Court announced Friday afternoon it will hear a case on whether municipalities are able to bar unhoused people from sleeping on public property or whether homeless people have a constitutional right to camp on public land, as cities continue to grapple with rising homeless populations.

via: NBC News

The justices will review an appeals court ruling, the only one of its kind, which found that ordinances in Grants Pass, Oregon, are prohibited under the Constitution’s 8th Amendment.

The ruling in question was issued by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2022 and applies to all nine states within its jurisdiction, including California. Several of those states have large populations of homeless people.

Among those asking the Supreme Court to overturn the appeals court are local officials in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Phoenix and other cities.

The appeals court ruled 2-1 that Grants Pass, which is about 250 miles south of Portland, cannot “enforce its anti-camping ordinances against homeless persons for the mere act of sleeping outside with rudimentary protection from the elements, or for sleeping in their car at night, when there is no other place in the city for them to go.”

The decision only applies in situations in which homeless people “are engaging in conduct necessary to protect themselves from the elements when there is no shelter space available,” the court added.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The ruling was met with considerable criticism within the appeals court itself, with the entire bench deciding narrowly against reconsidering it in a 14-13 vote.

The decision was a “dubious holding premised on a fanciful interpretation of the 8th Amendment,” wrote one dissenter, Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain. The ruling has the effect of “paralyzing local communities from addressing the pressing issue of homelessness, and seizing policymaking authority that our federal system of government leaves to the democratic process,” he added.

Lawyers for Grants Pass defended the city’s actions, saying there is “nothing cruel or unusual about a civil fine for violating commonplace restrictions on public camping.”

Theane Evangelis, one of the city’s lawyers, said in a statement that the appeals court ruling has “contributed to the growing problem of encampments in cities across the West.”

The ordinances in question bar sleeping or camping on publicly owned property including sidewalks, streets, bridges and city parks. Punishment can include fines of up to several hundred dollars and exclusion orders barring people from public property.

The case arose after a group of homeless people challenged the application of the ordinances. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said in court papers that the city’s plan is to “drive its homeless residents into neighboring jurisdictions by making it impossible for them to live in Grants Pass without facing civil and criminal penalties.”

Homeless people are being punished for “simply existing,” the lawyers added.

Ed Johnson, a lawyer at the Oregon Law Center who represents the plaintiffs, said in a statement that nothing in the lower court ruling prevents cities from prohibiting encampments, it just addresses whether people can be punished for sleeping outside when they have no other options.

“Nevertheless, some politicians and others are cynically and falsely blaming the judiciary for the homelessness crisis to distract the public and deflect blame for years of failed policies,” he added.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The Supreme Court in 2019, before the appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett created a 6-3 conservative majority, declined to take up a similar case from Idaho in which the city of Boise was seeking to enforce a criminal prohibition against camping on public property.

In that case, the 9th Circuit ruled in 2018 that such prosecutions would violate the 8th Amendment. In its 2022 ruling, the same court extended that reasoning to civil penalties, prompting the city to ask the Supreme Court to intervene.



Loading

Comments
Advertisement

Facebook

You May Also Like

Entertainment

MEGA/WENN A New York artist who painted an official portrait of former President Barack Obama denies sexual assault accusations made by an artist from...

Entertainment

After Cassie filed a $30 million lawsuit in November 2023, a video resurfaced that showed LeBron James saying, “there’s no party like a Diddy...

Entertainment

Patrick McDermott/Getty Images Simone Biles lashed out at social media users who continue to “disrespect” her husband, Jonathan Owens, according to People.com. Jonathan was...

Entertainment

MEGA/WENN Sean Combs is bracing for more damaging video leaks, according to sources. Last week, CNN exclusively obtained a video that showed Combs kicking...

Entertainment

Screengrab Sean Combs apologized and begged for forgiveness in a video posted on his Instagram page on Sunday. Combs acknowledged kicking and stomping his...

Entertainment

“John Legend and Chrissy Teigen just kicked us out of the photo booth after we waited 30 mins to get pics.” Screengrab Chrissy Teigen...

Entertainment

Screengrab Sean “Puffy” Combs will not be prosecuted for attacking former girlfriend Casandra “Cassie” Ventura at a hotel in 2016. The incident happened at...

Entertainment

Instagram Houston Rockets star Jalen Green is a father for the second time in three months. The 22-year-old shooting guard welcomed a daughter with...

Entertainment

John Lamparski/Getty Images When CNN aired disturbing video of Sean Combs attacking his then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura in 2016, people wondered if he would be...

Advertisement

Copyright © 2022 I AM SISSY BROWN

Back